Blame
Date:
Wed Feb 1 05:00:29 2023 UTC
Message:
Daily backup
01
2023-01-22
jrmu
version=pmwiki-2.2.130 ordered=1 urlencoded=1
02
2023-01-22
jrmu
agent=Mozilla/5.0 (X11; OpenBSD amd64; rv:82.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/82.0
03
2023-01-22
jrmu
author=jrmu
04
2023-01-22
jrmu
charset=UTF-8
05
2023-01-22
jrmu
csum=
06
2023-01-22
jrmu
ctime=1609006914
07
2023-01-22
jrmu
host=198.251.81.119
08
2023-01-22
jrmu
name=Debate.Python
09
2023-01-22
jrmu
rev=1
10
2023-01-22
jrmu
targets=
11
2023-01-22
jrmu
text=[11:47:03] %3cjrmu> https://bugs.python.org/issue34605%0a[11:47:09] %3cjrmu> `` Avoid master/slave terminology ''%0a[11:47:49] %3cjrmu> ``For diversity reasons, it would be nice to try to avoid "master" and%0a "slave" terminology which can be associated to slavery.''%0a[11:48:09] %3cjrmu> https://www.theregister.com/2018/09/11/python_purges_master_and_slave_in_political_pogrom/%0a[11:48:14] %3cjrmu> ``The Redis community wrestled with this last year. In 2014, Drupal, after some argument, swapped the terms "master" and "slave" for "primary" and "replica." The same year, Django traded "master" and "slave" for "leader" and "follower." CouchDB carried out a similar linguistic purge, also in 2014.''%0a[11:49:02] %3cjrmu> I mean these words in my opinion make little difference%0a[11:49:09] %3cjrmu> people can call it primary or replica if they want, I don't really care%0a[11:49:36] %3cjrmu> but it's a pretty useful litmus test to see if the group is bent on doing reverse discrimination%0a[11:50:20] %3cjrmu> I would recommend either forking or altogether avoiding any software project that is pushing these term changes%0a[11:50:23] %3cjrmu> as a defensive precaution%0a
12
2023-01-22
jrmu
time=1609006914
13
2023-01-22
jrmu
author:1609006914=jrmu
14
2023-01-22
jrmu
diff:1609006914:1609006914:=1,11d0%0a%3c [11:47:03] %3cjrmu> https://bugs.python.org/issue34605%0a%3c [11:47:09] %3cjrmu> `` Avoid master/slave terminology ''%0a%3c [11:47:49] %3cjrmu> ``For diversity reasons, it would be nice to try to avoid "master" and%0a%3c "slave" terminology which can be associated to slavery.''%0a%3c [11:48:09] %3cjrmu> https://www.theregister.com/2018/09/11/python_purges_master_and_slave_in_political_pogrom/%0a%3c [11:48:14] %3cjrmu> ``The Redis community wrestled with this last year. In 2014, Drupal, after some argument, swapped the terms "master" and "slave" for "primary" and "replica." The same year, Django traded "master" and "slave" for "leader" and "follower." CouchDB carried out a similar linguistic purge, also in 2014.''%0a%3c [11:49:02] %3cjrmu> I mean these words in my opinion make little difference%0a%3c [11:49:09] %3cjrmu> people can call it primary or replica if they want, I don't really care%0a%3c [11:49:36] %3cjrmu> but it's a pretty useful litmus test to see if the group is bent on doing reverse discrimination%0a%3c [11:50:20] %3cjrmu> I would recommend either forking or altogether avoiding any software project that is pushing these term changes%0a%3c [11:50:23] %3cjrmu> as a defensive precaution%0a
15
2023-01-22
jrmu
host:1609006914=198.251.81.119
IRCNow